It’s a strange thing to see whenever a newStar Trekseries or character is announcedand revealed to have some form of current social commentary in it, that there’s inevitably a comment from some disgruntled person. Such comments come in various phrasing, but often amount to someone saying they’re no longer going to watchStar Trekbecause it’s gotten so political.
The original series (known as TOS-eraTrek) came out during the 1960s, a time of upheaval in the cultural fabric of the United States. Campus kids protested the war in Vietnam, hippies were expanding their minds with all sorts of new drugs, and America was in an uproar over the burgeoning Civil Rights movement.Star Trekwas birthed into this world. Like all great sci-fi, it was a reflection of its time, not just simple speculation about the future.
RELATED:Star Trek: Inconsistencies Between The Old And New Shows
Going Boldly
Gene Roddenberry, the creator ofStar Trek,schlepped the show all over town. He pitched his concept as a combination ofHoratio Hornblower(high-seas adventures; think the originalMaster and Commander) andWagon Train, about a gaggle of different space explorers, all part of a unified crew. The characters would take the risks explorers of old did, but in the vast frontier of space itself. It was finally the production company Desilu, helmed by the first lady of television comedy and a bold entrepreneur, Lucille Ball, that took on the show, and the rest was history.
When Star Trek debuted, it broke new ground in all sorts of ways. The first and most obvious was in the makeup of its core cast, the bridge crew of the Enterprise itself. There was a black woman,Lieutenant Uhura(Nichelle Nichols); there was a Japanese man, Hiruku Sulu (George Takei). This not only cemented the show’s notion that everyone was created equal, it was groundbreaking and bold.
Featuring a Japanese pilot a scant two decades after America had interred Japanese people after a kamikaze attack on Pearl Harbor was a huge statement. So was showing an African American — especially a woman — in a powerful position during the Civil Rights movement. The show would make another statement by introducing Pavel Chekov (Walter Koenig), a Russian co-pilot, in season 2. This was at a time when the Cold War was raging. The Russians were still regularly depicted as villains, and would continue to be so up through reactionary films likeRed Dawnin 1984 (the Cold War ended in 1989). Two decades after the Holocaust, the main character James T. Kirk (William Shatner) was played by an actor of Jewish heritage, and his best friend, Spock (Leonard Nimoy), was too. The crew of the Enterprise portrayed a united human race.
Where No Man Has Gone Before
Gender was portrayed just as equally as race. Women were not only part of the main bridge crew, but they served all over the ship and never took back seats to the male cast members. Nurse Chapel (Majel Barrett) is just as memorable a character as Dr. “Bones” McCoy (DeForest Kelley). Even the costumes worn by the crew were revolutionary. While the go-go boots and miniskirts of the women’s uniforms might seem backwards today, they were bold for the time according to stars like Grace Lee Whitney, who played Yeoman Janice Rand (famous for her woven beehive hairdo).
The year the show came out, 1966, was still eight years before a woman was able to get a credit card without a man cosigning one for her. Feminism was in its infancy.Women on TV wore big flouncy skirts, making them into model-perfect housewives. At a time like that,Star Trekallowed women to dress in a vastly modern way, and one that was reflective of the youth of the time, rather than the matriarchy of the war years. It also didn’t have the women sexualized by the male characters because of how they dressed, which was absolutely forward-thinking for the time.
In the particular case of Uhura, her Blackness, on top of being a woman, was of utmost importance. Nichelle Nichols relates a story in which she was at a party, speaking to no other thanMartin Luther King, Jr.himself, (a man who, with his 1968 assassination, wouldn’t live to seeStar Trek’s cancellation in 1969), and expressed thatStar Trekwasn’t doing much for her, and she was thinking of moving on. King, according to Nichols, braced her and told her that she was playing a character who was only not judged for being a woman, but not judged for being black; that unlike every other pop culture woman, she’d broken the mold of being a maid on TV and must continue. Taking him at his word, she did, to the audience’s delight and history’s lasting gratitude. NASA would eventually use her image to advertise for women volunteers.
5 Year Mission
Though Roddenberry hoped for his series to make it the five years necessary to hit syndication at for the era, the show only ran for three before the animated revival in the 1970s and the subsequent movies, when Paramount tried to compete withStar Wars’ unheralded success. From the beginning, the show featured luminaries of great sci-fi, from Robert Bloch (whose career dated back to the days ofH.P. Lovecraftand hit big withHitchcock’sPsycho) toHarlan Ellisonwriting episodes. These big names took what could have been a goofy little pulp show and brought gravitas and drama to it, and won Emmy awards for doing so.
The stories themselves can be pulpy; Kirkfighting the primative Gornis one of the more famous. Equally famous are the episodes where Kirk and company fight supercomputers mentally controlling their populations in episodes like “The Return of the Archons.” In others, Kirk and crew go after old friends Kirk knew from Starfleet that have become actual space Hitlers, as in “Patterns of Force.” And in case anyone still couldn’t grasp thatStar Trekwas political — even after seeing episodes about free thinking without centralized control, or how Nazism was bad — couldn’t deny stories like “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield.” It’s plain to see that statements are being made in this episode, which features literal, split-down-the-middle, half black/half white aliens, fighting a half white/half black alien to the death. All the while, the Enterprise crew tries to encourage peace since they’re basically the same. Anyone who couldn’t see the political statements here could never see it. Refusing to understand what’s being said here is simply ignorant.
Star Trek, and science fiction at large, is and always was political from its conception. The vast contributions by the casts and crews over the years has only cemented that; moreover,Star Trekis best when it’s boldly political. It’s never been of its time, but of all times: the goals of harmony amongst the peoples of Earth, of exploration, of striving to be better transcend generations and hold out a beacon for humanity itself. It’s only up to viewers to reach for those stars.
